LSA logo

Conference Report

 

LSA Home Page

Newsletter

LSA 2003
Call for Papers

Reports

9th World Sport for All congress, Arnhem, 27-30th October 2002

Conference website: http://www.sfa2002.nl/english/congress/message/

REPORT on the event by Mike Collins M.F.Collins@lboro.ac.uk
Institute of Sport and Leisure Policy, Loughborough University

Like many other delegates, I was delayed in England by gales and only arrived on Monday lunchtime. Then the conference was held in beautiful autumnal weather in birch and willow woodland at the National Sports Centre in Papendal on the edge of the Hoge Veluwe National Park.

Some 450 delegates from 95 countries attended. Unlike academic conferences, most people (75%) were there to discuss policy and practice; 10% each were from government and academic life and the remainder from media and commercial organisations. Two fifths were from the host nation and a third from the rest of Europe, but over 60 came from both Latin America and Asia. Fewer than ten came from the UK. There were six plenary sessions, each with three speakers, generally interesting and of good quality.

The broad theme was whether sport for all and elite sport were part of a single system and an issue of internal priorities, or whether they had drifted so far that they were separate systems, competing for resources and political attention. Roland Renson (Leuven) argued the latter case, even likening them to twin towers with few or no bridges; Ruud Vreeman (Netherlands Sports Federation/Dutch Olympic Committee, now a single organisation) contested this with his organisation's experience, though he had to admit that commercial support and sponsorship for Sport for All was not yet common and often small scale. In a later session, Bert van Lingen (Dutch Football Association) said that his FA had determined that it would "protect the pyramid' of SFA, though it had not committed a sum of money from the elite for the grass roots, like the 5% urged on professional sports by DCMS in England. As one might expect, the majority of keynotes urged the wisdom and necessity of keeping the full span of the activity together. Irena Szewinska (Poland) spoke of the hero/model role of elite performer like her, and their social responsibility to give back to the sports that had promoted them; Johan Koss (Canada) had been demonstrating this through the work of his Olympic Challenge organisation in the refugee camps of the world.

Joseph Hackforth (Munich) argued simply that sport for all has to explain its work more graphically and gain more allies in all forms of the media; besides Koss, Bob Munro (Mathare Youth Sports Association)and Kip Keino (Kenyan OC) both movingly described work, respectively in the huge Mathare slum of Nairobi, and amongst the elite Kenyan athletic squad, each of whom was expected to give 15 hours a week of community service to sport.

In relation to the voluntary sector, Anita White (consultant, UK) used case studies of female volunteers as a local club officer and a chairperson of a national federation to illustrate the commitments required of volunteers. John Boultbee (consultant and former Director, Australian Institute of Sport) claimed that programmes to promote participation sometimes could be helped by volunteers who had succeeded in sport and sometimes needed professional workers; he illustrated is argument with examples from swimming, cricket and rugby. Paul de Knop strongly proposed that amateur sport needed total quality management, to be credible with funders, and with parents increasingly in need of reassurance about the safety of their children and the competence of both the sports staff and organisations looking after them. Later his colleagues Jo van Hoecke and Cathy van der Bergh outlined their work on quality in clubs in Belgium and Holland and Paul Wylleman spoke of the challenges facing Higher Education Institutes with both large numbers of recreational and elite clients.

The crucial role of activity in combating the disastrous growth of non-communicable ('lifestyle') diseases was outlined by Pekka Puska (World Health Organisation) who described the new emphasis on exercise and sport in its World Health Day and other programmes; this was reinforced by Willem van Mechelen (Amsterdam), who argued that the great rise in obesity and diabetes mellitus since 1980 had more to do with lack of exercise than poor, over- rich diet, quoting Prentice and Jebb in the British Medical Journal, and that obesity showed a greater response to exercise than to either pills or placebos.

Other interesting papers were by Ase Tornheim (Norway/US) on the growth of the Special Olympics programme, Valerie Oprisan (Rumania) on the need for improved human resource management programmes, and Diane le May (Quebec) on a primary school sports programme with some of the same features as the British TOPs.

My own paper (Mike Collins) sought to demonstrate the limitations introduced by three factors on the earlier aspirations for Sport for All in the UK (Collins, 2002). First, the social gradients which mean that exclusion affects certainly a third of the population (Collins, 2003); second, the need for perhaps £400m a year to replace the 1970s pools and sports halls now wearing out from age, use and budget building; and third, the high priority and resource allocation to elite sport; copies available on request to M.F.Collins@lboro.ac.uk.

The organisation at Papendal was as immaculate as one would expect; Monday evening was spent in the visitor centre of the Netherlands Open Air Museum with its rotating auditorium showing 200 years of Holland, and its great collection of floodlit buildings and windmills, where we were regaled by an incredibly enthusiastic Director and knowledgeable amateur guides from the Friends Organisation. The following evening dinner was held in the 30,000 seat Gelde Dome arena, home of Vitesse FC and with its removeable turf and sliding roof.

TAFISA's SFA congresses are different from academic conferences, but they allow a wide view of developments around the globe. Having not attended since the 3rd conference in Tampere in 1990, I was stuck by the pace of development and the growth of awareness of the findings of scientific research, and the role of IOC's Olympic solidarity fund in contributing to this must be acknowledged. England/UK does not even have an entry in the TAFISA 2001 almanac (TAFISA,2002).

Can I encourage UK colleagues to come to the next one in Rome in 2004?

I am grateful to the UK Sport International committee for a grant towards the cost of attendance.

References:

M.F. Collins (2002) Sport for All in England as a multifaceted product of domestic and international influences in da Costa, L. and Miragaya, A-M (eds) World wide trends in Sport for All TAFISA/UNESCO, Aachen/Oxford: Meyer and Meyer Sport.

M.F. Collins (January, 2003) Sport and Social Exclusion. London: Routledge

TAFISA (2002) TAFISA World 2001: an almanac. Tokyo: Sasakawa Sports Foundation