LSA 2005
Edinburgh

Edinburgh CastleEdinburgh CastleScott MonumentScott MonumentTatooEdinburgh TatooRoyal MileRoyal MileLeithLeith HarbourScottish Dancing

Leisure Studies Association
LSA Conference 2005

   Festivals and Events: Beyond Economic Impacts
July 6-8, 2005, Napier University, Edinburgh
Keynote Speakers
Dr. Neil Ravenscroft
Principal Research Fellow, Chelsea School Research Centre, University of Brighton
Festivals of Transgression: Governance, Discipline and Reworking the Carnivalesque
Dr. John Horne
University of Edinburgh
The Four 'Knowns' of Sports Mega-Events
David Williams
Chief Executive, EventScotland, Edinburgh
Government Sponsored Event Agencies and their Role in Optimising the Benefits of Major Events
Prof. Mike Robinson
Director of the Centre for Tourism and Cultural Change, Sheffield Hallam University
Celebrating Life, Loss and Mess: The Bleak Poetics of Excess
Dr. Keith Nurse
University of the West Indies, Trinidad & Tobago
Festival Tourism and the Cultural Industries in the Caribbean
James McVeigh
Festival Programme Development Manager, Arts Council England
Arts Council England and the Festival Landscape
Anita Thornberry
Head, Tourism Unit, The London Development Agency
Major Events: Providing a Rationale for Public Expenditure


LSA 2005
main page

Proposals after January 15


Programme

Keynotes

Parallel Sessions Details


Schedule




Registration

Venue

Contact/
Information

Committee

LSA Home


 

Prof. Mike Robinson
Director of the Centre for Tourism and Cultural Change,
Sheffield Hallam University

 

Celebrating Life, Loss and Mess: The Bleak Poetics of Excess

Festivals have widely been conceptualised as public occasions of celebration, as moments of cultural exuberance and time locked spaces of revelry; in part, as a response to periods of collective and life 'crisis' and socio-political rupture. Indeed, there has always been a paradox in the nature of some festive occasions as markers of oppression, tragedy and death. The meta-narratives of history and the chronologies of our ow n lives are punctuated by celebrations - visible and visceral occasions and expressions of joy and happiness. As both a consequence of, and a reaction to, the vagaries of 'globalisation', the number of celebratory festivals in the world has dramatically increased over recent years and shows no sign of abating. In addition to the greater number of festivals, there has also been a qualitative shift in the practices of public festivity that accentuates the very notion of celebration.

But what exactly are we celebrating? Who are engaged in the celebrations? And is, what is now a politically legitimated and socially embedded phenomenon, effective as a mechanism for social righting, cultural re-enchantment and political engagement. Here I argue that we are moving toward - and in some cases have already moved to - a position where we are celebrating shadows and despair, form rather than content and are giving into a form of festivity that propels us into a nihilistic vision of emptiness.

Professor Mike Robinson holds the Chair of Tourism Studies at Sheffield Hallam University. He is also Director of the Centre for Tourism and Cultural Change - an international research body that carries out work on the changing relationships between tourism and culture. His PhD is in Political Science from the University of East Anglia where he also taught.
          For the past 10 years Mike's work has focused upon research in the field of tourism and culture. He has published books on Tourism and Cultural Conflicts, Literature and Tourism, and Cultural Festivals and Tourism. A further book - Festivals and Tourism: Remaking Worlds - is shortly to be published. He is also currently co-editing a volume of essays on Tourism and the Postcard. Mike is founder and Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, an Associate Editor of the Scandinavian Journal of Tourism and is on the board of three other international journals. He is Series Editor of the Tourism and Cultural Change Book Series.
          Mike's research interests include heritage tourism, tourism and literature/travel writing, cultural festivals and tourist behaviour/experience. Mike has worked on tourism projects in Spain, Scandinavia, Slovakia, Germany, Canada and India. His recent research, funded by the USA's Social Science Research Council, focuses on tourism and heritage relationships in the Middle East where he is working in Syria, Jordan and the Lebanon. He is a member of the Council for British Research in the Levant Committee / Board of Trustees.
          Mike founded and is a member of the research committee of the International Festivals and Events Association (IFEA) of Europe, co-founded the Festivals Special Interest Group of ATLAS.
back to top of page

Dr. Neil Ravenscroft
Principal Research Fellow, Chelse a School Research Centre,
University of Brighton

 

 

Festivals of Transgression: Governance, Discipline and Reworking the Carnivalesque

Mikhail Bakhtin's description of the carnivalesque is one of the more frequently used interpretive devices for those seeking to enquire beyond the economic impacts of festivals and events. Although describing the knowing temporary inversion of social order common in medieval festivals (and still found in many hierarchical orders), Bakhtin's work has routinely been appropriated by those seeking to deconstruct the commodified spectacle of many contemporary staged events and themed attractions. The processions, the side shows and the grotesque bodies of contemporary events certainly invite this comparison. Indeed, event promoters are keen that such comparisons are made - that their events seem rooted in local culture, even if any connections with past festivals are largely spurious. Rather than interpretation, therefore, the application of Bakhtin has routinely been commodified, with image dominating form and substance. Not only does this do a disservice to the richness and complexity of Bakhtin's work, but it also masks the many ways in which festivals remain prime sites of governance and discipline.

The paper thus commences with a review of Bakhtin's work on the carnivalesque, contextualised by an analysis of how far this remains an appropriate interpretation of the role of contemporary festivals. This is informed by a number of authors, including Deborah Philips, Dean MacCannell, Rob Shields, Tom Hinch and Don Getz. It is also set within a broader theoretical frame that is informed by the work of Norbert Elias. The paper argues that festivals, as carnivalesque inversions of the everyday, can and are deployed to maintain and reinforce social order and, thus, the discipline of bodies and behaviours. Using recent work on the San Fermin fiesta in Pamplona, the paper argues that festivals offer a liminality in which people can engage in 'deviant' practices, safe in the knowledge that they are not transgressing the wider social structure they encounter in everyday life and that is infused in the moral codes of the festivals themselves. In the case of the San Fermines and other such events, the attraction of visitors is crucial, in providing a 'cover' for this activity, as well as conduit for the gradual legitimation of new and revised social values.

Thus, the paper argues, the essence of the carnivalesque is not the procession, the side show or the grotesque body. Rather, it is the cultural identity that links the event to the highly particularised forms of discipline prevalent in the host community. The inversions observed by Bakhtin thus reflected a wish to maintain a hierarchical social order just as clearly as the bravado of the bull running reflects a wish to maintain patriarchal hegemony in Pamplona. Rather than the sanitised festivals of consumer culture, therefore, the paper argues that contemporary forms of the carnivalesque are more likely to be found in marginalized and liminal events, such as raves and protests, through which different groups of people seek to impose on others their views, values and claims.

Although circumscribed through public order legislation, liminal events continue to offer forums through which transgressive behaviours can simultaneously be encouraged, controlled and, where necessary, marginalized. Informed by Gavin Parker's work on contested citizenships, the paper applies Bakhtin's observations and understandings to recent research on the governance, disciplining and control of counter-cultural movements in the UK, with a particular emphasis on the on-going contestation over land rights. The paper concludes that, as Judy Fudge and Harry Glasbeek argued two decades ago, the mobilisation of a 'right' (the carnivalesque inversion) to claim a right (a new social ordering) simultaneously disposes the claimants to legitimise the existing social order that allowed them the liminal space in which to mount the challenge. As such, Bakhtin's observations remain both relevant and pertinent to contemporary festivals and events, certainly with respect to their contribution to maintaining governance and the discipline of potentially transgressive bodies.

Neil Ravenscroft is Principal Research Fellow at the Chelsea School, University of Brighton. He has recently completed reserch on urban open space and people's quality of life (EU Framework V); and is currently working on negotiated access to inland water for canoeing (Environment Agency); and workforce development for the creative and cultural industries (Culture South East/Sussex Learning and Skills Council). Neil has written widely on a number of subjects related to leisure and culture, and has recently advised Sport England on the future for the local delivery of sport. Neil is currently co-managing editor of Leisure Studies and a member of the editorial board of the Journal of Retail and Leisure Property. He has served a number of years as a member of the LSA Executive Committee.
back to top of page

Dr. John Horne
University of Edinburgh

 

 

The Four 'Knowns' of Sports Mega-Events

Writing in The Guardian Slavoj Zizek (2005) has noted that when the US Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, engaged in a little amateur philosophy about the situation in Iraq in March 2003 he missed an important dimension. Rumsfeld stated the following:

          "There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know.
          There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know that we don't know.
          But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know".

Zizek added that Rumsfeld forgot to add the crucial fourth term, "'unknown knowns', things we don't know that we know'". Rumsfeld suggested that the main dangers in the confrontation with Iraq were the 'unknown unknowns'.

In this presentation I am going to agree with Zizek and suggest that it is an academic's duty to look critically at the assumptions, beliefs and obscene practices that are often suppressed -- the 'unknown knowns' -- of sports mega-events. Information will be used from studies of sports mega-events that have taken place, or are planned, in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe and North America to illustrate the four 'knowns'. It will be argued that rather than simply become cheerleaders for them, academics need to reflect critically on the effects, beyond economic impacts, that sports mega-events have.

Reference: Zizek, S. (2005) The empty wheelbarrow The Guardian 19 February p. 23.

Dr. John Horne is Senior Lecturer in the Sociology of Sport and Leisure at the University of Edinburgh. He has published several articles and book chapters on sport, leisure and popular culture and is the author of Sport in Consumer Culture (forthcoming, Palgrave) and co-author of Understanding Sport (1999, Spon, with Alan Tomlinson and Garry Whannel). He is the co-editor of Sport, Leisure and Social Relations (1987, Routledge, with David Jary and Alan Tomlinson), Japan, Korea and the 2002 World Cup (2002, Routledge, with Wolfram Manzenreiter) and Football Goes East: Business, Culture and the People's Game in China, Japan and Korea (2004, Routledge, with Wolfram Manzenreiter). He served as a Leisure Studies Association Executive Board member from 1998-2001 and acted as Publications Officer. He has edited two Leisure Studies Association publications Leisure Cultures, Consumption and Commodification (2001, Leisure Studies Publication No. 74) and Masculinities: Leisure Cultures, Identities and Consumption (2000 Leisure Studies Publication No. 69, with Scott Fleming).
          Working within sociological traditions that view sport as the product of contested social and cultural values and meanings in specific social formations, John Horne's recent research focuses on four topics: The commodification of sport; the development of sport, especially, but not exclusively, professional football, in East Asian societies; the rationale for and debates over, the hosting of major international sports mega-events; and social and cultural diversity in sport and leisure. Currently John is working on comparative research projects into policies toward hosting major international sports mega-events with colleagues in Asia, Europe, North America, Australasia and Africa (see for example John Horne and Wolfram Manzenreiter, 2004 'Accounting for mega-events: forecast and actual impacts of the 2002 Football World Cup Finals on the host countries Japan and Korea' in International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 2004, Vol. 39).
back to top of page

David Williams
Chief Executive, EventScotland, Edinburgh

 

 

Government Sponsored Event Agencies and Their Role in Optimising the Benefits of Major Events

The presentation "Government Sponsored Event Agencies and their Role in Optimising the Benefits of Major Events" will provide a case study on the creation of event agencies in both Australia and Scotland. It will cover the establishment of an events unit within the Tasmanian Government's Department of Sport and Recreation, the establishment of Queensland Events Corporation by the Queensland Government and the creation of EventScotland.

The presentation will also discuss some of the tangible and intangible benefits of events secured or supported by event agencies and the impact of that support on host cities and countries.

The presentation will also provide a brief overview of the global events industry and how cities and countries are using events to raise their profile internationally.

 
back to top of page

Dr. Keith Nurse
Institute of International Relations,
University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago

 

 

Festival Tourism And The Cultural Industries In The Caribbean

The Caribbean region enjoys a healthy international reputation in live entertainment, the performance and visual arts, carnivals, the music industry and other forms of popular culture that bolster regional and diasporic identity and cultural confidence. Festivals have proven to be an efficacious strategy to boost visitor arrivals and expenditures, airlifts, hotel occupancy rates, international media exposure and destination branding. Festival tourism in the Caribbean also plays a pivotal role in the industrial growth and export expansion of the cultural industries sector, especially the music industry.

The paper draws on the experience of festivals like Jamaica Sunsplash/Sumfest, the Meringue Festival in Dominican Republic, the World Creole Music festival in Dominica and the Trinidad Carnival. The paper concludes that festival tourism is an innovative means to enhance the competitiveness of Caribbean tourism and cultural industries.

 
back to top of pageback to top of page

 

James McVeigh
Festival Programme Development Manager, Arts Council England




Arts Council England and the Festival Landscape
 

Arts festivals have been a major part of the post-war cultural landscape of England and many research studies have been undertaken in the sector by academics, local councils, tourism bodies etc. Following the merger of the Arts Council of England and the English Regional Arts Boards in 2002 to form a single development organisation for the arts in England, the new Arts Council England has been reviewing its entire operation and initiating developments in a number of genre areas. In 2003 Arts Council England, in partnership with East Midlands Development Agency, undertook an economic and social impact study of cultural festivals in the east midlands. The recommendations of that research report were the basis of a pilot festival development programme that aimed to build the capacity of the festival sector through a series of practical measures. This pilot initiative was led by the only dedicated festival post in Arts Council England and sought to place the programme in the context of wider developments in the international festival sector. As a result of this work, Arts Council England is now in the process of a national strategic review of its support to the entire arts festival sector, asking what festivals 'do' for the arts sector and the wider community, and clarifying why Arts Council England supports the sector. This presentation will seek to illustrate the nature and work of the festival development programme, identifying its foundation within an impact research framework, and provide some initial thoughts on the national review, identifying strategic thinking on the impact of arts festivals.
Born and raised in Ireland, James joined Arts Council England after a number of years working in the arts. Most recently, he was Head of Marketing & Development with Salisbury Festival, one of the country's leading multi-arts festivals. Prior to that James had been employed in a number of roles in Liverpool having graduated from the University of Liverpool with an MA in Politics, specialising in Political Marketing. His roles in Liverpool included Director of Development for the Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Society, Business Development Manager with The Mersey Partnership and Development Marketing Manager with Liverpool John Moores University. James is responsible for building on the results of the Arts Council festival impact study which showed that festivals not only bring money and jobs into the local economy but can play a major role in enhancing image and developing civic pride.
back to top of pageback to top of page

Anita Thornberry
Head, Tourism Unit, The London Development Agency

 

 

Major Events: Providing a Rationale for Public Expenditure

Major Events are a very useful way of achieving significant benefits to a city both tangible and intangible. There are the obvious benefits of attracting domestic and international tourists to a city destination and enhancing the economy of that city through visitor spend in hotels and on sundry items. They can be a motivating factor for people to travel to the destination and extend their visit for longer than the duration of the Event itself thereby enhancing the economic benefit to the city and also encourage visitors to return to the city in the future.

However major events can have significant and apparently intangible benefits that, in the long term do translate into economic benefit but are harder to quantify. Intangible benefits such as partnership working - which is vital for the wider tourism industry but not easy to achieve - health benefits and crime reduction. Hosting a Major Event in a city showcases that city as somewhere that is dynamic and "can do", that it embraces visitors and has the ability to be organised politically to put on such an event. In terms of London, major events celebrate the multi-cultural diversity of the city from the Notting Hill Carnival to the Ealing Mela - the largest Mela held in Europe. Major Events declare that a city is welcoming to all and has something to offer people in their everyday lives so in that sense increase and sustain the population's civic pride about the city in which they live and can attract people to living in that city which is important when considering inward investment potential. Civic pride also contributes to a reduction in crime because it creates an environment in which such activity is not tolerated by the local population. It also creates an aspirational culture, encourages people to want to achieve more possibly through an entrepeneurial culture, which assists in increasing the health of the local population as wealth is achieved in the long term which impacts on people's eating habits and their general well-being.

In essence there are the obvious direct economic benefits generated through hosting Major Events which cannot be disregarded. But they are not the whole story and, in terms of the bottom line figure, it is often the intangible and long term benefits that have the most significant impact on a city.

After 5 years spent working in the City of London money markets, Anita began a B.A. History course at the University of Wales, Cardiff College in 1994 and finally graduating from Sussex University in 1998 with an M.A. in Contemporary History. In the same year, she began her career with English Heritage, initially in the Marketing Department, and over the next two years helped manage the "More" Campaign, the first advertising campaign by English Heritage in many years, amongst other projects. Latterly at English Heritage she worked in the Major Projects department on tourism projects at such sites as Stonehenge and Dover Castle. It was work on such projects that led, in 2002, to Anita being seconded to One NorthEast initially to secure a funding package for a series of tourism and regeneration projects along the Hadrian's Wall World Heritage Site but later to help restructure the tourism industry after the delegation of regional strategic lead on tourism to the English Regional Development Agencies by DCMS. Anita joined the LDA in January 2004 as a Project Manager, leading the approvals process for the new and groundbreaking Visit London grant agreement. She was promoted to Head of Tourism & Visitor Economy in August 2004.

 

This page updated April 4, 2005     Myrene McFee mcfee@solutions-inc.co.uk
The Leisure Studies Association is a Registered Charity No. 294997